Anesthesiology Research - Clinical Anesthesiology, Evidence Based Practice, Techniques

Anesthesiology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Anesthesiology, including details on clinical anesthesiology, evidence based practice, techniques.


Anesthesiology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Anesthesiology

Books on Anesthesiology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Preanesthesia clinics, information management, and operating room delays: results of a survey of practicing anesthesiologists.

Holt NF, Silverman DG, Prasad R, Dziura J, Ruskin KJ

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. natalie.holt@post.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND: One purpose of preanesthesia evaluation clinics (PECs) is to decrease the incidence of day-of-surgery delays and cancellations by ensuring that patients are medically ready for surgery. In several single-center studies, PECs have been shown to have a positive impact. However, limited information is available regarding their overall use and perceived effectiveness. METHODS: A survey was distributed to attendees of the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The survey addressed the national prevalence of PECs and the most common methods for referral to them. Respondents were also asked to address the impact of PEC visits on perceived prevalence of day-of-surgery delays caused by missing patient information. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred fifty-seven surveys were returned. Sixty- nine percent of respondents worked at institutions with a PEC. Fifty-seven percent of respondents indicated that delays occur in at least 1 in 10 patients not seen for preanesthesia evaluation prior to the day of surgery. For patients who had a PEC visit prior to surgery, the same frequency of delays was reported by 23% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Day-of-surgery delays caused by missing information remain relatively common despite preanesthesia evaluation. Possible causes for these delays include failures of information transfer, lack of consensus on criteria for surgical readiness, or other institutional factors.

Published 21 February 2007 in Anesth Analg, 104(3): 615-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Anesthesiology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Anesthesiology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (August)
  Issue 2 (September)
  Issue 3 (October)
  Issue 4 (November)
  Issue 5 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Anesthesiology Books

Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management

Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management